- CZ proposes a dark Dex to protect large transactions against priority and manipulation.
- Zero knowledge certificates are the key to guarantee privacy without offering verifiability.
- The debate in the industry is growing on balancing transparency with safe, private trade infrastructure.
A proposal from the founder of Binance Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has re -created the debate about the crypto industry about the structure and privacy standards of decentralized fairs. In a recent public statement, CZ drove the idea of a “Dark Pool Perpetual Dex”-an exchange model that protects user activity from the public image to prevent in the front, spoofing and manipulation.
Although the idea produces inspiration through traditional finances, the suggestion has caused a broader discussion about transparency, trust and infrastructure design in decentralized finances (Defi).
5/
Rekwisites to CZ for tracing the conversation. The future is not only about decentralization.It is about confidential coordination on a scale.
Let’s build it. Blog come on Monday with more detailed information.– Polyhedra (@polyhedrazk) 7 June 2025
The core problem called by CZ centers is the visibility of the order in the current DEX models. For most decentralized stock markets, user orders and liquidation levels are completely transparent and linked to public wallet addresses. This creates a risk for large traders, because the entire market can see their intentions.
As CZ has explained, a user trying to buy $ 1 billion in tokens would not want others to detect the order before it is filled, because this can invite the front of the front, where other traders act prior to the order to extract the profit.
The problem is enlarged in eternal futures markets. When liquidation points on the chain are visible, malicious actors can deliberately push markets to activate forced liquidations. In this context, CZ noted that dark Pools in traditional finances, private trading locations with minimal ordering exposure, often handle the volume of the public markets ten times. He suggested that a similar model could benefit trade with crypto-derivatives, in particular in combination with privacy relationship technologies.
Verifiability must be accompanied by privacy
While CZ emphasized the need for discretion to flow, Blockchain developers and researchers have encountered caution: without evidence mechanisms, a dark Dex risks an opaque system that has responsibility. Projects such as Polyhedra claim that the future is not only in privacy, but also in verifiable privacy, with the help of technologies such as zero-knowledge (ZK) prove to make coded but demonstrable operations possible.
A proposed solution includes the coding of order entries, the use of Matching engines supported with ZK and performing transactions in the chain in a way that confirms their validity without disclosing user data. This approach can eliminate in front and manipulation, while observers and regulators still allow to verify the honesty and correctness of the system.
Such an architecture would combine the benefits of trustless calculation with the strategic flexibility offered by dark trading locations. In contrast to Black-Box systems that work without supervision, these cryptographic methods offer mathematical security of correct behavior, even in fully private trade environments.
The industry responds as the infrastructure evolves
The proposal has focused on the entire crypto ecosystem, including Defi builders, institutional investors and protocolarchitects. It reflects a wider voltage between transparency and safety, two qualities that are often contrary to decentralized systems.
As the activity on the chain grows and more advanced traders in crypto markets, the infrastructure must adapt to new requirements for discretion, efficiency and protection against opponents’ behavior. The question now is not whether private DEXs are being built, but how they can be built to maintain the principles of verifiability and user autonomy.